After the International Court of Justice spoke in the name of human justice and decisively clarified the justice of the Palestinian cause, it emphasized the inevitability of the whole world's support for this justice—not through mere verbal support but by enabling the Palestinian people to rid themselves of occupation, exercise their right to self-determination, and resolve all issues of conflict in accordance with the rules and provisions of international law.
After the International Court of Justice undertook this historical role with full integrity, Israel, as the aggressor, found itself condemned. Its response was to spread lies and claim that these decisions hinder the resolution of the Palestinian issue through negotiation. This claim came even before the ink dried on the Knesset's decision, to prohibit the establishment of a Palestinian state and mandate that the Hebrew state not negotiate a solution to the Palestinian issue under the pretext that the Palestinian territories are Israeli territory and not occupied.
America, which said almost the same thing in objecting to the decisions of the International Court of Justice, resorted to justifying its immoral position, claiming that the court’s decisions hinder a negotiated solution to the Palestinian issue.
What is this naive hypocrisy? Where is the negotiation and where is the solution? And where is the truth? America not only receives the war criminal Netanyahu as described by Senator Sanders, but opens its coffers to him, to take from it without account and spend on the war of genocide he continues to carry out as he delivers his speech in the most miserable Congress.
It is the lie and hypocrisy in the face of bright truths, and this is the common policy trait of the two allies, the permanent aggressor, and the financier and supporter.
Yousef Ramadan is the Ambassador of Palestine to Bangladesh


Israel’s mask is slipping