Reliable Brokers
Online Investing
Alerts & Analysis
Easy Trading

Ducsu elections: Braille ballots introduced for visually impaired students for the first time

  • Student leaders welcome the initiative but call for a simpler, more inclusive process
  • Every visually impaired voter has to apply separately for a Braille ballot, which is an extra hassle. Many may even choose not to vote, says a student
Update : 25 Aug 2025, 08:45 PM

Visually impaired students will, for the first time, be able to cast their votes using the Braille method in the 2025 Dhaka University Central Students’ Union (Ducsu) and Hall Union elections.

An urgent notice signed by Chief Returning Officer Professor Dr Mohammad Jasim Uddin stated that voters wishing to use the Braille method must apply or communicate directly by August 26. Applications for Ducsu must be submitted to the Election Commissioner, while Hall Union applications must be submitted to the Returning Officer of the respective residential hall.

Despite the initiative, visually impaired students have expressed mixed reactions.

Dhaka University student Tafsirul Islam said: “On behalf of the Physically Challenged Development Foundation (PDF), we had requested Braille voting from the Ducsu election officers. Perhaps as part of that, the authorities have taken this initiative, which we certainly welcome. But every visually impaired voter has to apply separately for a Braille ballot, which is an extra hassle.”

He added: “Visually impaired persons already face many obstacles in movement. On top of that, to vote, one has to apply in two places and often needs help from someone else. As a result, many voters may not want to get involved in this hassle. Some may even choose not to vote.”

Tafsirul Islam is contesting as a member candidate from the Bamjot Protirodh Parishad panel in this year’s Ducsu election.

Speaking to the Dhaka Tribune, Tanmoy Ahmed, convener of the Dhaka University unit of PDF, said: “This is undoubtedly an important step, and we welcome such initiatives. However, if the administration made the process easier, it would be more effective for students with disabilities. Otherwise, this initiative may not see the light of day.”

He further raised concerns: “Firstly, the authorities already have information about students with disabilities. Why then should there be a need for separate applications? Secondly, if there is a plan to ensure voting rights for everyone, why only two days’ notice? Thirdly, much of the campus infrastructure is unsuitable for students with disabilities. In such a situation, how can a visually impaired student apply to two places? This should have been done proactively by the administration.”

He also warned: “If a suitable voting environment is not created for students with disabilities, they may be deprived of their constitutional rights. The administration must bear the responsibility. A half-hearted initiative is not acceptable.”

Top Brokers