Reliable Brokers
Online Investing
Alerts & Analysis
Easy Trading

Only turmoil. No strategy or unity

Polarization limits opportunities for productive policy discussion

Update : 11 Feb 2026, 11:26 AM

Following the significant political changes in Bangladesh after the Awami League government was overthrown on August 5, 2024, the country's political landscape presents both challenges and opportunities.

In the absence of the largest ruling party in the 2026 elections, there appears to be a unique opportunity for various political factions to redefine their roles and agendas. However, again, due to a lack of strong political will, the nation has witnessed some unwanted political mismanagement among major political parties, which could have been avoided, at least after a long battle to overthrow the fascist regime in Bangladesh.

The suspension of the Awami League from political activities and the next national parliamentary election have created a unique opportunity for some political parties to aspire to form the government for the first time since the nation’s independence in 1971.

While this situation creates the possibility of new leadership emerging in Bangladesh, voters are keenly interested in how these ambitious parties will address critical national issues, particularly the enhancement of women's participation in the nation-building process. The focus now is on fostering constructive dialogue and effective strategies to ensure that diverse voices contribute to the country’s development.

While the current shift encourages constructive dialogue among the parties as they navigate the challenging environment ahead, mainly after the election, the immediate focus may lean toward tactical positioning.

However, there remains ample room for strategic thinking on long-term socioeconomic development and governance initiatives, particularly by the next winning political party.

Concentrate on building alliances

Rather than providing detailed policy outlines and explicit guidance on how these strategic policies would be implemented, major political parties have focused on forming alliances, negotiating seat allocations, and solidifying their voter bases. Parties such as the BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami are focusing on coalition-building and seat-sharing rather than issue-based strategies.

Smaller third parties and newly formed alliances, such as the National Democratic Front and various leftist coalitions, continue to seek direction, further reducing policy clarity. Consequently, political efforts are primarily directed towards determining who will run where and with whom, rather than what actions they will take once in power.

Contentions Over fundamental national matters

Several structural disputes are currently under discussion, and while the parties have differing views on how to address them, this presents an opportunity to collaborate on developing a cohesive strategic policy. For instance, constitutional reform and good governance are pressing issues for many voters in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh plans to hold a constitutional referendum alongside the upcoming election to explore reforms that could enhance the balance of powers and institutional accountability. This initiative is a positive step toward addressing voters' concerns.

However, senior citizens raised a valid point about the interim government's need to strengthen the electoral commission’s capacity to help ensure free and fair elections, which citizens have been eagerly anticipating.

The legitimacy of the upcoming election is fundamental, as its results will play a critical role in ensuring political stability and fostering national development. While parties are still clarifying their positions on these reforms, there is potential to integrate these discussions into a more comprehensive policy agenda. By doing so, they can better address the broader issues at hand and work towards a more unified approach to governance and reform.

Short-Term priorities over long-term policy

The political landscape in Bangladesh is characterized by intense division, causing discussions to focus on identity, loyalty, and rivalry rather than constructive policy development.

Political parties are more defined by whom they oppose than by their policy differences, which limits collaboration on important issues.

In light of the chaotic political climate, much of the public discourse centres on winning the upcoming election and urgent governance issues, rather than on long-term strategies for economic reforms, climate initiatives, or social welfare.

For example:  

  • Several media reports and party activities suggest a focus on manifestos that make sweeping promises (such as women in leadership roles, youth involvement and their employment, anti-extortion measures, public money looting, anti-corruption efforts, foreign direct investments, the development of the country’s formal and informal economic sectors, social justice and human rights, institutional democracy and corruption control, and bank defaulters) but lack specific strategic plans.
  • The BNP’s manifesto addresses issues such as economic stability and foreign relations, but it is primarily framed as a set of immediate corrective measures rather than a long-term strategic plan. Neither BNP nor Jamaat-e-Islami clarified their role in regional and global political cooperation and collaboration on security and economic development.
  • Jamaat-e-Islami also has significant gaps in its political commitments; there is no clear expression of women's participation in the nation-building process, even though women in Bangladesh are the leading gender and their contribution is robust.
  • Neither BNP nor Jamaat-e-Islami has clarified the future of the Bangladesh Awami League, which is crucial to political stability in Bangladesh.

It is important for the major political parties participating in the upcoming parliamentary election in Bangladesh to clearly articulate their positions on various crucial issues. Citizens are eager to hear substantive proposals rather than just political rhetoric. Clear statements from the parties will help foster informed discussions and engagement among the electorate.

Dr ASM Anam Ullah (PhD) is an Australian academic, human rights activist, political analyst, and OHS and industrial relations expert. Views expressed are the writer’s own.

Top Brokers