The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has strongly opposed equating the 2024 mass uprising with the 1971 Liberation War, along with several other proposed constitutional amendments, including a change in the state’s official name and alterations to the fundamental principles of the constitution.
On Sunday afternoon, a two-member delegation led by BNP Standing Committee Member Salahuddin Ahmed, submitted its views on the reforms to National Consensus Commission Vice-Chairman Professor Ali Riaz, at the LD Hall of the National Parliament Complex.
Later, while briefing the media regarding their stance, Salahuddin Ahmed said: "We, on behalf of BNP, have given our opinion on the spreadsheet they gave us on the reports of the five reform commissions."
Commenting on constitutional reforms, Salahuddin said: "The preamble of the constitution, which everyone knows as the preamble, currently includes the 2024 mass uprising alongside the 1971 Liberation War. We do not find this appropriate. The original preamble should remain unchanged. If necessary, the events of 2024 can be incorporated into another section of the constitution."
He further emphasized that, as per Article 106 of the constitution, the interim government took the oath based on the Supreme Court’s opinion, which validates its legitimacy.
"Even if questions arise regarding its legitimacy, further verification in the future will address those concerns," he added.
BNP also advocated restoring the constitution to its pre-15th amendment state.
Additionally, the party recommended that the authority overseeing national identity cards and parliamentary constituency delineation should remain with the Election Commission
Opposition to state name change
BNP leaders also raised concerns over the proposed changes in the state's name, emphasizing that such an amendment could have significant historical and political implications.
The party argued that the existing name holds deep-rooted significance tied to the country’s identity and independence struggle.
The proposal to rename the state has sparked debate among political parties, with BNP asserting that such a move would erase historical legacies.
Salahuddin Ahmed said: "The people of Bangladesh have accepted the name of the state through long-standing practice. How much will be achieved with this proposal remains questionable. BNP does not agree with it”
Constitution and governance concerns
BNP criticized the government's approach to governance, alleging that recent legal and constitutional maneuvers were aimed at consolidating power rather than fostering democratic principles.
Party leaders highlighted the importance of an inclusive political environment to ensure fair representation and public trust.
BNP representatives pointed out that any changes to the constitution should reflect the people's will rather than being dictated by a ruling party.
BNP also objected to the inclusion of the interim government’s legitimacy in constitutional discussions, arguing that an unelected government should not have the power to amend fundamental aspects of the country’s governance structure.
They stressed the need for a democratic transition process and called for fair elections to restore public confidence in the political system.
Election Commission and electoral reforms
The party reaffirmed its demand for an independent Election Commission, free from government influence, to ensure credible elections.
BNP leaders said that election-related decisions should not be manipulated to favor the ruling party.
They insisted that the current system, which allows political influence over the election process, should be reformed to ensure transparency.
Historical context and political implications
Political analysts note that these developments reflect growing tensions between BNP and the ruling government regarding constitutional interpretations and political legitimacy.
The debate is expected to continue in the coming months as various political stakeholders engage in discussions over the proposed amendments and governance structures.
BNP's stance on these constitutional changes highlights broader concerns about the political landscape in Bangladesh.
As protests and opposition activities intensify, the party remains firm in its position that any constitutional amendments must align with democratic principles and historical realities.
The party has vowed to continue its movement to protect the historical context of the Liberation War and prevent any attempts to alter the nation’s foundational principles.
