• Friday, Jan 22, 2021
  • Last Update : 04:04 am

Prosecutor: ICC fears of ‘state policy’ to attack Rohingyas

  • Published at 10:31 am November 23rd, 2019
Rohingya
Bangladesh is now hosting over 1.1 million Rohingyas who have fled their homeland in Rakhine State after being persecuted by their own country Mahmud Hossain Opu/Dhaka Tribune

The court may exercise jurisdiction over crimes when part of the criminal conduct takes place on the territory of a State Party, she said

International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda has said the ICC judges feared that Myanmar may have ‘state policy’ to attack its minority Rohingya population in Rakhine state.

“The Judges accepted that there is a reasonable basis to believe that —there may have been a state (Myanmar) policy to attack the Rohingya population,” she said in a statement on Friday, reports BSS.

The statement came following the approval of ICC to commence an investigation into crimes committed against Rohingyas.

As per the Judges observation, the prosecutor said: “There are many sources indicating the heavy involvement of several Myanmar government forces and other state agents, and that members of the Myanmar armed forces (Tatmadaw), jointly with other Myanmar security forces and with some participation of local civilians, may have committed these crimes against humanity.”

“These coercive acts could qualify as the crimes against humanity of deportation and persecution on grounds of ethnicity and/or religion against the Rohingya population,” the prosecutor said referring to what ICC judges accepted to give the authorization.

Saying that the Judges authorised the investigation with broad parameters, Bensouda termed it as a significant development against atrocity in Myanmar.

On November 14, the ICC Judges of Pre-Trial Chamber III have authorised the prosecutor office to commence an investigation into the “Situation in Bangladesh and Myanmar.”

Mentioning that Myanmar is not a State Party of the ICC, but Bangladesh is, the prosecutor welcomed the Chamber’s conclusion that the alleged deportation of civilians across the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, which involved victims crossing that border, clearly establishes a territorial link on the basis of the “actus reus of this crime”- that is, “the crossing into Bangladesh by the victims.”

“The Court may exercise jurisdiction over crimes when part of the criminal conduct takes place on the territory of a State Party,” she said.

The prosecutor said her investigation will seek to uncover the truth and focus its efforts on ensuring the pursuit and success of its independent and impartial investigation.

She also noted that the Chamber saw no reason to disagree with “my assessment that there are no substantial reasons to believe that an investigation into the situation would not be in the interests of justice.”

In doing so, she said “we aim to bring justice to victims and affected communities, and count on the full support and cooperation of States Parties, civil society, and other partners.”

On July 4, the prosecutor sought authorisation to investigate the situation in Bangladesh/Myanmar in the period since 9 October 2016.

The Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC conducts independent and impartial preliminary examinations, investigations and prosecutions of the crime of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression.

Since 2003, the Office has been conducting investigations in multiple situations within the ICC’s jurisdiction in Uganda, Congo, Sudan; Central African Republic (two distinct situations); Kenya, Libya, C”te d’Ivoire, Mali, Georgia and Burundi.

The Office is also currently conducting preliminary examinations relating to the situations in Colombia, Guinea, Iraq, Palestine, the Philippines, Nigeria, Ukraine, and Venezuela.

Bangladesh is hosting over 1.1 million forcefully displaced Rohingyas in Cox’s Bazar district and most of them arrived there since August 25, 2017 after a military crackdown by Myanmar, which the UN called a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” by other rights groups.

122
Facebook 119
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail