• Wednesday, Oct 28, 2020
  • Last Update : 11:18 am

India bans Price Waterhouse from auditing listed firms for two years

  • Published at 10:12 pm January 11th, 2018
India bans Price Waterhouse from auditing listed firms for two years

India’s market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, has barred Price Waterhouse from auditing any listed company in India for two years for its alleged role in the 2009 Satyam scam, PTI reported.

The regulator also asked Price Waterhouse to pay Rs13.09cr, with a 12% interest per annum since January 2009.

The bench also batter two former Price Waterhouse partners, S Gopalakrishnan and Srinivas Talluri, from issuing audit certificates to listed companies for three years, The Times of India reported. Both chartered accountants were in charge of auditing Satyam when the fraud came to light.

The ban will be effective from the financial year 2018-’19 and will not affect auditing work for 2017-’18, the report said.

“Entities/firms practicing as chartered accountants in India under the brand and banner of PW shall not directly or indirectly issue any certificate of audit of listed companies, compliance of obligations of listed companies and intermediaries registered with SEBI...for a period of two years,” SEBI said in its 108-page order, according to The Hindu.

The scam

The Satyam scam was unearthed in 2009, after the then Chairman of Satyam B Ramalinga Raju admitted in a letter to overstating the company’s assets by Rs5,040cr. Shareholders lost nearly Rs14,000cr as a consequence.

In 2010, SEBI issued a show cause notice to Price Waterhouse and several other entities. In 2015, a special court in Hyderabad sentenced Raju to seven years rigorous imprisonment. In September 2017, Price Waterhouse had moved a consent plea with SEBI to settle the investigations related to its role in the Satyam scam.

Late on Wednesday, Price Waterhouse responded to the regulator’s ruling, saying it was “disappointed.”

“The SEBI order relates to a fraud that took place nearly a decade ago in which we played no part and had no knowledge of,” the firm said. “As we have said since 2009, there has been no intentional wrong doing by PW firms in the unprecedented management perpetrated fraud at Satyam, nor have we seen any material evidence to the contrary.”

The firm said it was “confident of getting a stay” as the SEBI order was “not in line with the directions of the Bombay High Court order of 2011.”

 
50
50
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail