• Thursday, Nov 15, 2018
  • Last Update : 02:38 pm

Five things that led to India's strikes in Pakistan

  • Published at 03:44 pm September 30th, 2016
  • Last updated at 03:45 pm September 30th, 2016
Five things that led to India's strikes in Pakistan
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi raised hopes of a new era in relations with Islamabad when he paid a surprise visit to his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif December last year. In the months since, relations between the nuclear-armed archrivals have unravelled, culminating in the Indian military's strikes this week on militants along the de-facto border with Pakistan in Kashmir that prompted a furious response from Sharif.
Also read- Pakistan needs to change its tune
Here are five reasons why the strikes occurred--

Pathankot attack

Just days after Modi's holiday visit to Sharif, militants from across the Pakistan border launched an audacious attack on an Indian airforce base that left seven soldiers dead. India blamed the raid at Pathankot in Punjab state on a Pakistan-based militant group that also staged a 2001 attack on the Indian parliament. Modi urged Sharif to take action against those responsible, which the Pakistani premier promised to do. But India became frustrated with what it sees as Pakistan's lacklustre response.   [caption id="attachment_18994" align="aligncenter" width="800"]An Indian security personnel stands guard on a building at the Indian Air Force (IAF) base at Pathankot in Punjab, January 5, 2016 Reuters An Indian security personnel stands guard on a building at the Indian Air Force (IAF) base at Pathankot in Punjab, January 5, 2016 Reuters[/caption] "India responded to that attack with measure and reason. Modi invited Pakistan investigators to come over and gather evidence for example, and such a strategy wasn't successful," said Ashok Malik, senior fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, a policy organisation in New Delhi.

Deadly Kashmir protests

Indian-administered Kashmir erupted in violence in July after a popular militant leader was killed in a gun battle with security forces. [caption id="attachment_18991" align="aligncenter" width="800"]An Indian army soldier patrols along a highway on the outskirts of Srinagar, September 29, 2016 Reuters An Indian army soldier patrols along a highway on the outskirts of Srinagar, September 29, 2016 Reuters[/caption] India slapped a curfew on the restive Himalayan region to try to stem the protests, and internet and mobile phone services were snapped. But residents continued to take to the streets to protest Indian rule, with more than 80 people killed in the ongoing unrest, mostly in clashes with security forces. Kashmir is divided between Pakistan and India, but both claim the territory in full and they have fought two of their three wars over its control.
Also read- Kashmiris warn India its crackdown is turning some to militancy
Militant groups, some based in Pakistan, have battled India's security forces for years for independence of the Muslim-majority territory from India or its merger with Pakistan. Sharif accused India's security forces of carrying out brutalities against unarmed civilians during the protests, further stoking tensions between the neighbours.

Uri army base attack

On September 18, militants staged a predawn raid on an Indian army base near the de-facto border dividing Kashmir, killing 19 soldiers -- the worst such attack in 14 years. [iframe id="http://www.reuters.com/assets/iframe/yovideo?videoId=369879218"] India blamed the attack at Uri on Pakistani-based militants, the same group blamed for the Pathankot attack. Modi vowed to punish those responsible, while also launching a diplomatic drive to isolate Pakistan, including by pulling out of a regional summit, in a major snub to Pakistan.

Public pressure

The Uri attack triggered public fury and demands for military action, including from senior members of Modi's own party. [caption id="attachment_18992" align="aligncenter" width="800"]People wave national flags to celebrate after India said it had conducted targeted strikes across the de facto frontier, in Ahmedabad, India, September 29, 2016 Reuters People wave national flags to celebrate after India said it had conducted targeted strikes across the de facto frontier, in Ahmedabad, India, September 29, 2016 Reuters[/caption] "Modi was under pressure for quite sometime to respond militaristically after dovetailing with Nawaz Sharif failed," said Mohan Guruswamy, chairman of the Centre for Policy Alternatives, a Delhi-based think tank. Others predicted Modi would respond eventually with military action, given his credentials as a strong Hindu nationalist. [youtube id="ecAxpeM29sQ"] "This government, more so than others, was expected to respond because Modi is seen as a tough leader, he is seen as a leader who is going to punish those who hurt India," Malik said. But Malik also said Modi was left with no choice because of what the army said was substantial intelligence of militants preparing to attack Indian towns and cities.

International opinion

India may have also been counting on the fact that Modi enjoys a closer relationship with Washington than his predecessors, and therefore international reaction to India's strikes might be muted.
Also read- What will happen if India-Pakistan lock into nuclear war?
"The diplomatic pressure to dissuade India from retaliating is not there," Malik said. "There is exasperation (in Washington) with Pakistan and that has played to India's advantage," Malik said of US demands for Pakistan to take action against Taliban militants moving across its border into Afghanistan.