Al Masud Hasanuzzaman is a British Council scholar, a senior full-bright scholar and a fellow of Japan Foundation. A retired professor of Government and Politics Department at Jahangirnagar University, Hasanuzzaman shares his views on the current situation and the forthcoming interim government of Bangladesh in an exclusive interview with Dhaka Tribune’s Siam Sarower Jamil.
Why did Sheikh Hasina feel compelled to leave the country at the last moment?
Sheikh Hasina's departure to India was not a sudden event but the result of mounting pressures. The government's delayed decisions, coupled with a hardline stance on the quota movement, led to escalating casualties and growing public anger. These issues, along with longstanding grievances, ultimately left her with no choice but to leave the country at the last moment.
Is there a risk that India's relations with the new interim government could suffer if Hasina stays in India for a long time?
I don’t believe it will have a significant negative impact if she does not engage in politics. However, her son, Sajeeb Wazed Joy, has made varying statements at different times about Sheikh Hasina's political involvement and future plans. It would be preferable for Hasina to leave India sooner rather than later, as I've heard she doesn't intend to stay in India permanently and is actively seeking a safer location. If Sheikh Hasina remains in India for an extended period, the risk of her political influence being utilized increases, which may not sit well with the people of Bangladesh. Her continued political activity could strain Bangladesh-India relations. Both countries share significant geographical, strategic, economic, and cultural ties, particularly concerning the North Eastern states. Given their interdependence, I believe India can maintain a positive relationship with the new interim Bangladeshi government."
Hasina's regime had good relations with India. Would the collapse of her regime allow China to increase its influence in Bangladesh?
As I previously mentioned, Bangladesh's strategic geographical position is a key asset. While China may seek to expand its influence, it is essential for the new government to focus on political, economic, and social reforms. If China’s involvement proves beneficial, its influence could indeed grow. With ongoing reforms and shifts in the political environment, new opportunities may arise for all parties involved.
What factors could have led to Dr Muhammad Yunus being chosen as the chief adviser to the interim government? Does this reflect a potential lack of political expertise within Bangladesh?
Dr Yunus is widely respected, except among some Awami League leaders. The general populace is weary of seeing the same political parties in power repeatedly, and Dr Yunus is viewed as a credible, fresh option, especially given Bangladesh's strained relationship with the West. His appointment is seen as an opportunity to improve these relations. While political talent in Bangladesh is not necessarily lacking, it has often been overshadowed by a 'scam before power' mentality. Democracy needs to be balanced and nurtured. The existing political talent needs to be organized and developed.
Do you believe Dr Yunus has the capability to bring together the interim government and unify the country?
There are several factors to consider. While Dr Yunus's administrative skills are untested, his charisma and connections in Europe might prove advantageous. Achieving unity will require support from other government figures, as he cannot do it alone. Although he faces significant challenges, his international network could provide valuable assistance.
