• Thursday, Oct 22, 2020
  • Last Update : 03:50 pm

Bangladesh’s energy conundrum

  • Published at 10:17 pm February 18th, 2019
Where the focus should be Bigstock

Fossil fuels continue to be a decisive barrier to clean energy transition

In spite of being the “Next Eleven” emerging economies of this century, Bangladesh is witnessing a trend of moving backwards in terms of energy consumption. Balancing the capitalization on the recent growth rate, while ensuring sustenance of such by not hampering the environment, has become a two-faced obstacle in the way of the industrialization of Bangladesh. 

In developing economies, growth in modern sectors like industry, motorized transportation, and urban development requires gigantic growth in energy consumption. But it should also be kept in mind that energy use also reflects climatic and geographic factors. Energy usage has been growing rapidly in low and middle-income countries, with Bangladesh being no exception. Total energy use refers to not only refined petroleum products and nuclear power-based energy consumption, but also to the power usage that comes from combustible renewables, industrial and municipal waste including solid biomass and animal products, and liquid and gas from biomass. 

Leaning upon naturally devastating and expensive energy resources like coal and nuclear power plants, in spite of having the scope of using low-cost renewable energy sources, has raised a burning question about the course of Bangladesh’s power-sector policies. The fact of the cost declination of renewable sources is clearly seen in a recent report by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA).The cost of installing 1MW capacity of a solar power plant has been reduced to Tk11 crore from Tk35 crore between 2010 and 2017. 

Again, global average cost of electricity (excluding government incentives) from solar photo-voltaic has decreased from Tk28.8/kwh in 2010 to Tk8/kwh in 2017, a solid 72% reduction.Presently, per unit wind and solar electricity is being produced at lower than Tk 3.5 crore. India has set a prominent example regarding the reluctance towards coal, and leaning upon renewable energy. India’s Central Electricity Authority has shown reluctance towards coal plants having lesser profit and proposed shutting down nearly 50,000MW of coal capacity by 2027.

It is important to note that the global cost of coal-induced environmental pollution and health hazards have reached a historical high. The Rampal coal-based power plant, expected to fulfill a chief portion of total energy demand of Bangladesh, has been considered one of the major destroyers of physio-chemical conditions of Mongla and the Sundarbans by the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). 

It is indicating that climate, topography, air and water quality, land-use pattern, aquatic ecosystems, floral and faunal diversity, capture fisheries, and tourism of the Sundarbans and the surrounding areas would be affected by the proposed power plant. A recent study by Khulna University saysthe benefits of Rampal is very poor are far lower than the negative irreversible impact. Even UNESCOhas raised concerns and anxieties about the impacts of Rampal on the Sundarbans.

According to “Environmental assessment guidelines” by Asian Development Bank (ADB), a coal power plant uses only 33-35% of the coal's heat to produce electricity, and rest of the heat is released into the atmosphere. After using billions of gallons of cooling water, they are released back into the lakes, rivers, or oceans with chlorine or other toxic chemicals, causing thermal pollution, infertility of soil, and destruction of aquatic life.

According to a joint study by University of Rajshahi and Shahjalal University of Science and Technology,the pH values, heavy metal, and organic carbon in the farmland soil suggest that coal mining deteriorated the surrounding water and soil quality.

Apart from the establishments of coal and nuclear power plants, Bangladesh is on the way to have one of the leading markets of solar house systems (SHS) in the last two decades. It has seen the installation of around four million SHS, including some great initiatives by the government, trying to introduce the practice of using renewable energy and compensate for the loss and damage. 

But this scenario disguises the grim certainty of some unavoidable factors, like poor quality of a few solar panels which barely contribute to the “solarization” of the country, improper tax incentives, lack of local manufacturing focal points, inappropriate policies, non-regulated pricing, limited authority of Sustainable And Renewable Energy Development Authority, etc.

It is high time our government moved to clean energy from non-renewable based power generation.

Shooha Tabil is a Climate Researcher at Practical Action Bangladesh.

blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail