• Monday, Jan 25, 2021
  • Last Update : 04:19 am

ED: A need to update our defamation laws

  • Published at 12:32 am January 14th, 2021
GAVEL and hammer
Photo: BIGSTOCK

This sets an extremely dangerous pattern

There can be no state without functional laws; by definition, laws exist to protect the citizens’ rights and ensure they receive justice when wronged. However, when the law itself is far from functional, not only does it threaten the very people they are supposed to protect, but can end up making a mockery of justice. 

Unfortunately, that is the reality of certain laws in our country, and nowhere is this more applicable than in regards to our defamation laws. While having in place defamation laws by itself is not the problem, it becomes a slippery slope when third parties are allowed to file defamation cases on behalf of someone who may not even agree with the complaint. 

We have seen this play out in reality often enough. Even when the party alleged to have been defamed has himself or herself not filed any case, and is against the filing of cases, there are others who do not hesitate to file these cases. This sets an extremely dangerous pattern, and as we have seen repeatedly, it can be weaponized to silence people across the board and discourage any opposing opinions.  

Moreover, this liberty to file cases just racks up case after case, creating a larger backlog and contributing to nothing but more work for an already overburdened judiciary. 

However, the recent example of two lawyers filing defamation cases against the former Dhaka South City Corporation (DSCC) mayor, Sayeed Khokon, on behalf of the current mayor, Sheikh Fazle Noor Taposh, shows, as clear as day, why allowing third parties to file cases on behalf of another can be downright embarrassing, often causing more trouble and rarely coming to an amicable solution. It is heartening to see that good sense has prevailed, and Mayor Taposh has urged the complainants to withdraw the cases.  

Therefore, it is imperative that the authorities concerned take a long, hard look at these provisions that exist within our legal system, and when it comes to our defamation laws, make the necessary amendments.  

66
Facebook 64
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail