• Tuesday, May 26, 2020
  • Last Update : 06:46 pm

Stepping on the gas

  • Published at 12:03 am July 2nd, 2019
Stove, Fire, Gas
Bigstock

Gas is now a scarce commodity in Bangladesh, and its price needs to reflect this

It should come as little surprise that the government’s decision to increase the cost of gas -- somewhere between 21% to 64%, depending on the sector -- has resulted in much opposition from consumers and business owners alike.

But the truth of the matter is that gas is a luxury that the urban poor rarely, and the rural poor almost never, have access to, and ends up being a commodity subsidized primarily for the urban middle classes. 

Indeed, the rural poor typically pay more for their energy than do the urban middle classes who enjoy the gas subsidy.

In fact, one of the reasons that we have been unable to expand our gas network to the extent we should have is because the price has been kept artificially low, thus starving the sector of the funds needed for exploration and expansion of the network.

While low gas prices may seem like a good idea in the short term, they benefit only a relatively small slice of the population, and not the one most in need.

Furthermore, gas is now a scarce commodity in Bangladesh, and its price needs to reflect this. Let the market decide how this resource is to be used most efficiently. By subsidizing gas to the extent we do, we only ensure that it is used inefficiently, and does not go where it would do most good or where it is needed most.

In addition, the money saved from higher gas prices can both be re-purposed towards the population truly in need and also provide funds for the government to diversify our energy sector -- from importing liquefied natural gas to investing further in renewable sources and green energy -- which is really where we should be spending money.

If we truly care about the poor and disadvantaged, such a move is not only warranted, but necessary.

If we continue to complain about gas prices, citing consumer rights and the plight of the urban middle classes as the reason, then it betrays a complete lack of understanding for how out-of-touch we are when it comes to catering to the poor in this country. 

It is ironic that some of the loudest voices in defense of the subsidy are those who claim to speak for the poor, the vast majority of whom do not even have access to gas.

It is only through cutting down this wasteful subsidy that Bangladesh can both focus on serving the energy needs of the neediest of its citizens and at the same time invest in more sustainable long-term energy solutions for the future, which is where the funds should be directed.

60
56
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail