• Thursday, Sep 16, 2021
  • Last Update : 04:37 pm

Experts question if WHO should lead pandemic origins probe

  • Published at 05:25 pm July 2nd, 2021
Security personnel keep watch outside Wuhan Institute of Virology
File photo: Security personnel keep watch outside Wuhan Institute of Virology during the visit by the WHO team, in Wuhan on February 3, 2021 Reuters

Pesuasion-based approach of UN agency is 'doomed to fail,' they say

The World Health Organization (WHO) is drawing up plans for the next phase of its probe into how the coronavirus pandemic started, but an increasing number of scientists say the UN agency it is not up to the task and should not be the one to investigate.

Numerous experts, some with strong ties to WHO, said political tensions between the US and China make it impossible for an investigation by the agency to find credible answers.

What is needed is a broad, independent analysis closer to what happened in the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear disaster, they said.

The first part of a joint WHO-China study on Covid-19 concluded in March that the virus probably jumped to humans from animals and that a lab leak was “extremely unlikely.” The next phase might try to examine the first human cases in more detail or pinpoint the animals responsible — possibly bats, perhaps by way of some intermediate creature.

But the idea that the pandemic somehow started in a laboratory — and perhaps involved an engineered virus — has gained traction recently, with President Joe Biden ordering a review of US intelligence within 90 days to assess the possibility.

Also read- Experts: World no closer to Covid-19 origins despite WHO probe

Earlier this month, WHO emergencies chief Dr Michael Ryan said the agency was working out the final details of the next phase of its probe and that because WHO works “by persuasion,” it lacks the power to compel China to cooperate.

Some said the agency’s approach is precisely why a WHO-led examination is doomed to fail.

“We will never find the origins relying on the World Health Organization,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the WHO Collaborating Centre on Public Health Law and Human Rights at Georgetown University. “For a year and a half, they have been stonewalled by China, and it’s very clear they won’t get to the bottom of it.”

Gostin said the US and other countries can either try to piece together what intelligence they have, revise international health laws to give WHO the powers it needs, or create some new entity to investigate.

The first phase of WHO’s mission required getting China’s approval not only for the experts who travelled there but for their entire agenda and the report they ultimately produced.

Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, called it a “farce” and said that determining whether the virus jumped from animals or escaped from a lab is more than a scientific question and has political dimensions beyond WHO’s expertise.

Also read- WHO mission finds no answers in Covid-19 probe

The closest genetic relative to Covid-19 was previously discovered in a 2012 outbreak, after six miners fell sick with pneumonia after being exposed to infected bats in China’s Mojiang mine. In the past year, however, Chinese authorities sealed off the mine and confiscated samples from scientists while ordering locals not to talk to visiting journalists.

Although China initially pushed hard to look for the coronavirus’s origins, it pulled back abruptly in early 2020 as the virus overtook the globe. An Associated Press investigation last December found Beijing imposed restrictions on the publication of Covid-19 research, including mandatory review by central government officials.

Jamie Metzl, who sits on a WHO advisory group, has suggested along with colleagues the possibility of an alternative investigation set up by the Group of Seven industrialized nations.

Jeffrey Sachs, a professor at Columbia University, said the US must be willing to subject its own scientists to a rigorous examination and recognize that they might be just as culpable as China.

“The US was deeply involved in research at the laboratories in Wuhan,” Sachs said, referring to US funding of controversial experiments and the search for animal viruses capable of triggering outbreaks.

“The idea that China was behaving badly is already the wrong premise for this investigation to start,” he said. “If lab work was somehow responsible (for the pandemic), the likelihood that it was both the US and China working together on a scientific initiative is very high.”

Facebook 51
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail