The attack on journalists and media is occurring when Bangladesh, in fighting the Covid-19 pandemic, needs a reliable and independent media the most, to protect itself from fake news and panic generated by misinformation
The Sampadak Parishad has condemned the recent spate of cases and arrests of editors, journalists, writers, and university teachers, under the Digital Security Act (DSA) for expressing critical views about mismanagement in dealing with Covid-19.
The organization has also expressed grave concern about the deteriorating environment for free and independent journalism, and increasing instances of police action against media professionals.
In the last few months, nearly 40 journalists have been charged under the hated Digital Security Act (DSA), of whom 37 have been arrested. These arrests have created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation making normal journalistic work extremely risky if not nearly impossible, reads a press release issued on Tuesday by Sampadak Parishad.
The statement was signed by Sampadak Parishad President Mahfuz Anam and Secretary General Naem Nizam.
It said this attack on journalists and media is occurring when Bangladesh, in fighting the Covid-19 pandemic, needs a reliable and independent media the most to protect itself from fake news, and panic generated by misinformation.
The Bangladeshi media is playing a vital role in keeping the people informed, publishing news of successes and hope, pointing out inadequacies of our pandemic response, and facilitating public dialogue to map out our course for rebuilding. An attack on the media at this time is to endanger our possibility of stable recovery, it said.
“We also notice with deep concern that the DSA has become a most frequently used law when more time tested laws to dispense justice exist in our statutes. This is because under DSA, police can arrest without a warrant and most of the provisions (14 out of 20) are non-bailable, which ensures the person arrested remains in jail,” the statement read.
Some of the frequently cited reasons for arrests under the DSA are: criticizing local administration, spreading rumours, covering protests, making defamatory remarks, harming religious harmony, writing false news, etc. These reasons for arrest are by definition vague and subject to wide and arbitrary interpretation.
The DSA empowers police to arrest on suspicion and without a warrant. Out of its 20 provisions of punishment, 14 are non-bailable. As such, whenever a case is lodged, police promptly arrests, and when an accused is brought before a magistrate, he or she is almost automatically sent to jail.
Sampadak Parishad feels that the DSA has become a plaything in the hands of a vested quarter who use this anti-press and anti-freedom of expression law whimsically and at will to harass and intimidate journalists and to prevent them from exposing corruption and misuse of funds that the government is presently allocating for the people, especially the poor.
“From the outset, Sampadak Parishad opposed this law as we knew of its evil consequences on free media and freedom of speech. At that time the law minister assured the media that the DSA was enacted only to prevent cyber-crime and will never be used to curtail freedom of the press. Statistics show that more journalists, teachers, and intellectuals have been arrested under the DSA than cybercriminals, especially in the last six months,” it added.
Given the original objection and the experience of the last two and half years, it is evident more than ever that the DSA must be scrapped if freedom of speech and freedom of the press is to have any meaning, in the Parishad’s estimation.
“Thus we demand that use of the dreaded Digital Security Act (DSA) against the media and journalists must be stopped immediately and we urge the parliament to take expeditious steps to remove this anti-freedom law from our statutes,” the press release said.
“We also demand the immediate release of all journalists arrested under DSA and withdrawal of cases against them, and that measures be taken against those who have blatantly misused this law for vengeance and personal gain,” it added.