• Tuesday, Aug 11, 2020
  • Last Update : 09:45 pm

Human Rights Watch condemns Digital Security Act

  • Published at 07:25 pm September 25th, 2018
web_digital-security-act-ict_dsa_Zakir
Photo: Syed Zakir Hossain/Dhaka Tribune

Sections 25(a) and 31 contained vague descriptions of offences, and were lacking sufficient precision to make clear what speech would violate the law

The Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Monday condemned the Digital Security Act passed by the Bangladesh parliament as a blow to freedom of speech in the country. 

“The new Digital Security Act is a tool ripe for abuse and a clear violation of the country’s obligations under international law to protect free speech,” said HRW Asia Director Brad Adams in a statement on the organization’s website.

“With at least five provisions criminalizing vaguely defined types of speech, the law is a license for wide-ranging suppression of critical voices,” he added.

Sections 21, 25(a), 31, 29, and 28 of the act are among those identified by HRW as having the scope for criminalizing free speech, violating international standards on free expression. 

Section 21 authorizes sentences of up to 14 years in prison for spreading “propaganda and campaign against the Liberation War of Bangladesh or spirit of the Liberation War or Father of the Nation.” Such a provision violates the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which states that laws which penalize the expression of opinions about historical facts are incompatible with a country’s obligations to respect freedom of opinion and expression, the HRW statement said.

Furthermore, Sections 25(a) and 31 contained vague descriptions of offences, and were lacking sufficient precision to make clear what speech would violate the law. This increases the likelihood of self-censorship, it added.

Meanwhile, HRW also said Sections 29 and 28, while more specific than the equivalent provisions of the ICT Act, were still not in line with international norms. Defamation as identified in Section 29 should be a civil offence, not criminal, and Section 28’s prohibition on speech that hurts someone’s religious feelings, reinforced by criminal penalties, cannot be justified as a necessary and proportionate restriction on speech, according to HRW.

“The passage of this law utterly undermines any claim that the government of Bangladesh respects freedom of speech,” Adams said. “Unless parliament moves swiftly to repeal the law it just passed, the rights of the country’s citizens to speak freely will remain under serious threat.”

57
53
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail