• Wednesday, Dec 08, 2021
  • Last Update : 12:02 am

High Court releases full verdict on Hindu widows' share of husbands’ properties

  • Published at 06:57 pm October 12th, 2021
High Court Supreme Court
File photo of the Bangladesh Supreme Court Dhaka Tribune

The case initiated as a Khulna widow inherited her husband's farm land in 1996

The High Court has published the full verdict over its order that Hindu widows are entitled to shares in all the properties of their late husbands and not just their homesteads.

The verdict paved the way for Hindu widows to regain their rights to husband's property after 63 years. When this law is brought into effect, the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act of 1936 will be applicable in Bangladesh, the verdict said.

The High Court bench of Justice Miftah Uddin Choudhury published the 22-page verdict on Tuesday. 

On September 2, 2020, the same bench delivered the verdict in a case over the property of a Hindu family in Khulna.


Also Read - Hindu leaders at loggerheads over reforms


According to the case statement, Jyotindra Nath Mandal, defendant Gauridasi's brother-in-law, filed the case with the Batiaghata Judicial Court in 1996, in which the lower court declared that widows had rights only to the area of the houses in which they lived, and not to agricultural property. 

Later, as Gauri Dasi appealed to the district judge in the same year, the verdict was that widows also had rights to agricultural land in the same manner in which their husbands had their rights. 

The matter then came to the High Court. The court ruled that the law did not specify any property which can include real estate, agricultural land, cash or any other type of property.

On one hand, there is no opportunity to differentiate between agricultural land and homestead- whereas these are necessary for the survival of the widow, who is in effect dependent on her father-in-law's farmland for her livelihood.


Also Read - Minority leaders press home for commission, end to discrimination


After long hearings, the High Court ascertained the opinions of amicus curiae, Barrister Uzzal Bhowmick. 

According to Section 3 (1) of the 1936 Act, Gauri will inherit all the property left by her father-in-law just like her husband who died before his father.

Bhowmik also said that Hindu widows lost their share in agricultural land in a 1948 judgment of the Indian Federal Court in this regard. It was later adopted by Bangladesh in 1972.

89
Facebook 76
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail