• Saturday, Sep 26, 2020
  • Last Update : 01:19 am

Rights activists thrash digital security law draft

  • Published at 01:28 am October 2nd, 2016
Rights activists thrash digital security law draft
The activists made the remarks at a press conference organised by Moulik Odhikar Shurokkha Committee (Committee for the Protection of Fundamental Rights) at Dhaka Reporters Unity auditorium yesterday morning. The draft was approved by the cabinet on August 22 and later sent to the Law Ministry for scrutiny. In 2015, it was first named as Cyber Security Act, but later renamed to Digital Security Act 2016. Eminent jurist Shahdeen Malik, who chaired the event, said there is no doubt that a law is required to control cyber crimes, “but the Digital Security Act, if enacted, will not benefit anyone as 90% of the text is unacceptable.” The draft was written in such a way that it could never be amended to make it usable, he said, adding that there were many loopholes in the draft while the text did not specify the offences clearly. Shahdeen alleged that the proposed law would encourage corruption in the name of curbing criminal activities and create scopes for pro-government lawyers and bureaucrats. “Nobody is thinking about the citizens,” he said, adding that citizens’ rights had been curbed in the recently enacted laws. Dhaka University law teacher Prof Mahbubur Rahman observed that the main drawback of the draft was its unclear language which would allow the government to misuse the law. “Moreover, the digital security agency to be established under the Act is likely to be controlled by the government,” he added. Tahmina Rahman, director of Article 19 Bangladesh and South Asia, mentioned that cyber crimes are internationally considered as civil offence, rather than criminal offence. “So, the draft should be revised to imply proper punishment in accordance with the global practice.” Supreme Court lawyer Jyotirmoy Barua criticised the proposed law for not having any bail provision. “Section 37 of the draft says even the judge concerned realises that the accused may not be involved in the crime, s/he cannot grant the accused bail. The independence of the judiciary has been curbed through this provision,” he said. “... While the offences are covered under the ICT Act 2013 (amendment) and the Penal Code, why do we need a subsidiary one [Digital Security Act]?” the lawyer questioned.
50
50
blogger sharing button blogger
buffer sharing button buffer
diaspora sharing button diaspora
digg sharing button digg
douban sharing button douban
email sharing button email
evernote sharing button evernote
flipboard sharing button flipboard
pocket sharing button getpocket
github sharing button github
gmail sharing button gmail
googlebookmarks sharing button googlebookmarks
hackernews sharing button hackernews
instapaper sharing button instapaper
line sharing button line
linkedin sharing button linkedin
livejournal sharing button livejournal
mailru sharing button mailru
medium sharing button medium
meneame sharing button meneame
messenger sharing button messenger
odnoklassniki sharing button odnoklassniki
pinterest sharing button pinterest
print sharing button print
qzone sharing button qzone
reddit sharing button reddit
refind sharing button refind
renren sharing button renren
skype sharing button skype
snapchat sharing button snapchat
surfingbird sharing button surfingbird
telegram sharing button telegram
tumblr sharing button tumblr
twitter sharing button twitter
vk sharing button vk
wechat sharing button wechat
weibo sharing button weibo
whatsapp sharing button whatsapp
wordpress sharing button wordpress
xing sharing button xing
yahoomail sharing button yahoomail