Why did it take so long for them to confirm the hack and its scale? Why did it take them so long to tell users and prompt them to protect themselves? State-sponsored attacks are typically for political, not financial gain. So why were details reportedly being sold online? What evidence is there that it was state-sponsored? Verizon, which has agreed to buy Yahoo, said it had not been told until a couple of days ago - why not? And why is Marissa Mayer, a chief executive who has presided over bad deals and now the biggest breach in internet history, still in charge? Verizon told the BBC it had learned of the hack "within the last two days" and said it had "limited information". The company added: "We will evaluate as the investigation continues through the lens of overall Verizon interests, including consumers, customers, shareholders and related communities. "Until then, we are not in position to further comment." Yahoo said in a statement: "Online intrusions and thefts by state-sponsored actors have become increasingly common across the technology industry."Yahoo waited nearly two months to tell Verizon about the massive breach of 500 million users https://t.co/C2Uxzrnpzi pic.twitter.com/H44FE4t1Vp
— BI Tech (@SAI) September 22, 2016