Beyond the ballot: Moving from water promises to human rights

In the sweltering political climate of 2026, the air is thick with the rhetoric of transformation. From the high-rises of Dhaka to the cyclone-battered coasts of Satkhira, citizens are being promised a "humanitarian state" and a departure from the "corrupt cabal" of the past. 

Yet, a fundamental, life-sustaining reality remains trapped in the "quicksand of assurances": The right to safe water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH). This neglect risks alienating citizens who feel their basic needs are ignored, fostering frustration, and a sense of abandonment.

The irony is as deep as the tube wells that increasingly run dry. While political manifestos are replete with grand designs for macroeconomic stability and judicial reform, they remain remarkably parsimonious when it comes to the taps and toilets of the ordinary person. 

According to the 2025 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), 73% of Bangladeshis may have reached the "basic" sanitation level. Still, this statistic is a hollow victory that masks a systemic failure in quality, sustainability, and equity. We are a nation that has mastered the art of the promise but faltered in the science of the pipe.

The "July National Charter 2025," a product of the student-led uprising that reshaped our political landscape, offers a radical departure from this inertia. 

Though the charter may lack the technical jargon of the development sector, its core tenets -- decentralization and the elevation of human dignity -- are the essential ingredients for a WASH revolution. 

It is high time our political parties acknowledge that "the right to safe water" is not a peripheral concern to be managed by mid-level bureaucrats, but a constitutional pillar that the state must be legally compelled to uphold. Together, we can demand this change and build a future where everyone's dignity is protected.

Furthermore, the Charter’s emphasis on the financial and administrative independence of local government provides a direct answer to our historical failures. 

For decades, agencies like the Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE) and various Water Supply and Sewerage Authorities (WASAs) have operated through a top-down, Dhaka-centric model that often treats village water needs as a footnote. 

If the 2026 victors are serious about reform, they must hand the keys of the WASH budget to local representatives. Only then will a school's latrine or a community's water point be treated as a localized priority rather than a distant line item.

Perhaps the most glaring omission in the current political discourse is the "period poverty" and gender-blindness of our national infrastructure. 

While the NCP manifesto has made commendable strides by mentioning gender-sensitive WASH and mandatory menstrual hygiene facilities in schools and workplaces, this cannot remain a solitary voice in the wilderness. 

In a nation where nearly 30% of schoolgirls still miss classes during their periods due to a lack of safe, private spaces, menstrual hygiene is not merely a health concern -- it is an educational crisis and an economic inhibitor.

The economic imperative for immediate, affirmative action is staggering. Every $1 invested in WASH generates an estimated $4.30 return through increased productivity and reduced healthcare costs.

As the Network of WASH Networks recently highlighted in their 8-point memorandum to political parties, vague promises are insufficient. We need clear, specific commitments such as:

  • The immediate removal of taxes on menstrual hygiene products to end the indignity of period poverty.
  • The universal distribution of health kits through the existing community clinic network.
  • A climate-resilient WASH budget earmarked explicitly for coastal and vulnerable regions where rising salinity is turning water into a weapon of displacement.
  • The integration of an "equity index" in all water and sanitation projects to bridge the widening chasm between the urban rich and the rural poor.

The 2026 election is a referendum on our national priorities. All political parties must reconsider their current positions and recognize that a "humanitarian state" cannot be built on parched throats and undignified sanitation. 

Affirmative action must be taken immediately -- not because it is politically expedient, but because it is a moral and constitutional necessity. 

Our collective future depends on acting now to uphold every citizen's right to water and sanitation, reinforcing our shared responsibility to create a just society.

Only when water and hygiene are treated as non-negotiable human rights will Bangladesh truly emerge from the shadows of its past and stand as a modern, equitable republic.

Fayazuddin Ahmad is an Advocate and Development Professional.