Will Belém be another betrayal?

The climate crisis has laid bare one of the greatest moral and political challenges of our time: The question of responsibility. Although climate change has become a universal experience, its causes and consequences are not shared equally. The industrialized nations of the Global North, North America, and some parts of East Asia bear the historical burden of driving greenhouse gas emissions through centuries of industrialization, resource extraction, and fossil-fuel dependency.

Meanwhile, the Global South, including countries such as Bangladesh, finds itself at the frontline of a crisis it did not create. Inequity defines the heart of the climate justice debate that those who cause a crisis must take responsibility for addressing its devastating consequences.

Bangladesh has some of the worst climatic effects in the world, despite producing less than 0.5% of the global emissions. Erratic rainfall, flash floods, drought, increased cyclones in southeast Bangladesh, rising sea levels in the coastal belt, and salinization of agricultural fields all pose threats to livelihoods and displace communities. There is an unseen tale of homes, harvests, and identities lost after every storm and flood.

The politics of climate justice

For centuries, wealthy countries built their wealth by burning fuels, cutting down trees, and using up resources as if there would never be a shortage. Now, places like Bangladesh are suffering the most because of these actions. This isn’t about sympathy or charity. It’s about accountability. Those who built their wealth on pollution should now help the countries suffering because of it.

But the truth is, we’ve been hearing promises for years. The famous $100 billion a year has been talked about again and again, but where is it? Every year, leaders make big announcements, but when the time comes to deliver, it’s all delays and excuses.

Meanwhile, Bangladesh, which hardly adds anything to global emissions, is being hit the hardest. Villages in Bangladesh are disappearing under water during the time of floods, farmers are losing their land, families are forced to migrate again and again. People are suffering for something they didn’t create.

And yet, the big polluters in the Global North still carry on business as usual. It just feels wrong. Deep down, everyone knows it. Climate justice is about doing what’s right. It’s about keeping promises and helping those who’ve been left to face the damage alone.

COPs have long been the global stage where responsibility for the climate crisis is debated and often deferred. Over the years, these gatherings have offered both hope and deep frustration. Bangladesh has consistently been a loud and clear voice in the room, reminding the world that not all countries share equal responsibility for this crisis.

From Glasgow to Sharm El Sheikh to Dubai to Baku and now Belém, each COP has shown progress in discussion, but little in real action. The creation of the Loss and Damage Fund at COP27 marked a historic recognition that those hardest hit by climate disasters deserve compensation, not sympathy. This milestone was the result of decades of pressure from developing nations like Bangladesh, which repeatedly demanded concrete support over empty targets.

Yet, even this progress risks becoming symbolic unless the fund is fully financed and accessible to affected communities. COP28 and COP29 saw some contributions from industrialized nations, but these barely scratch the surface; hundreds of millions of dollars pledged against losses that run into the trillions.

Year after year, the pattern repeats: Big speeches, promises made, slow delivery, and long delays. For countries like Bangladesh, diplomacy can no longer remain mere words on paper. Through community-based adaptation projects, early-warning systems, and local disaster preparedness, we have turned survival into innovation lessons. But no level of local effort can replace global fairness. Bangladesh can continue adapting, but unless the larger players take real responsibility, the struggle will never end.

As the world turns its eyes toward COP30 in Belém, Brazil, it feels like the last chance to prove that these global meetings can mean something more than talk. We’ve had so many conferences, so many promises, and so little real change. This time needs to be different.

COP30 should be the moment the world finally moves from saying sorry to actually doing something. The Amazon, where this summit will take place, says it all. The forests that help the Earth breathe are now struggling to survive. It’s a reminder that nature itself is on the edge and so are millions of people in places like Bangladesh, where the impacts of this crisis are already daily reality.

Real climate progress cannot be measured by how many promises are made or speeches given. It is seen in the people who regain their homes, the farmers who lose their land and can plant again, and the children who can dream of a safer future. For Bangladesh and the Global South, the struggle continues not just for survival, but for respect, fairness, and being acknowledged.

Will COP30 be remembered as the moment when the richest nations finally matched their words with action? Will those old promises from Glasgow, Sharm El Sheikh, Dubai, and Baku finally turn into real support for countries fighting to survive? Or will Belém become just another chapter in the same story -- another meeting full of speeches, headlines, and applause, but empty when it comes to results? The world doesn’t need another round of fine words. It needs courage and honesty. And most of all, it needs action now.

Syed Navid Anjum Hasan is a Development Worker.