Dissenting voices

A letter from the secretariat of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands was sent to the Department of Environment and Forests of Bangladesh on June 22, 2011.

In that letter, the Ramsar secretariat wanted to know more about the following matters from the Ministry of Environment and Forests.

First, regarding the plan to build a coal-burning power-plant right next to the Sundarbans, which is a Ramsar Site.

Based on media reports, the Ramsar secretariat expressed concern that if the planned Bangladesh-India joint venture to build a power-plant at the ecologically critical area one to two kilometres away from the conserved forest of Sundarbans goes ahead, then it will result in the emission of an excessive amount of carbon dioxide as well as other dust.

This eventually could result in putting the animal and plant-life diversity in that region at grave risk.

Therefore, the Ramsar secretariat asked for an EIA (environmental impact assessment) for a possible impact on the Sundarbans.

Second, regarding the loading and unloading of coal at Akram point in the Sundarbans. The Ramsar secretariat wanted to know, in relation to the Phulbari coal power-plant project, about the possible negative impact on the Sundarbans that would result from increased shipping traffic, the loading and unloading of coals, and the building of new physical infrastructure at Akram point.

Finally, on the possible negative impact of building a ship-yard and silos within the Sundarbans conservation area.

After receiving this letter from the Ramsar secretariat, the Ministry of Environment and Forests sent out letters, soliciting opinions, to the Directorate of Forests, Department of Electricity, Department of Fuel and Mineral Resources, Department of Shipping, Department of Industries, and Department of Food. Of these, the Department of Food and Department of Industries refrained from expressing any opinion.

The Department of Electricity and Department of Fuel and Mineral Resources extolled the virtues of the proposed project, avoiding the main question and offering hocus pocus instead.

However, what is noteworthy here is that in regards to this project that the government is in a hurry to carry forward without any proper environmental assessment, there are departments within the government, such as the Directorate of Forests and Environment, and the Department of Shipping, who have expressed strong objections to the construction of a coal-burning power-plant that might harm the Sundarbans.

Opinion of the Directorate of Forests

The chief conservationist Ishtiaque Uddin Khan, in a letter dated September 29, 2011, told the Ministry of Forests:

“The Directorate of Forests is the Legal Custodian of the Sundarbans of which the Ramsar Sundarbans Site is a part.

“ It would not be wise to construct any industrial factory inside the Sundarbans and the Landscape Zone that might have a negative effect on the bio-diversity of the Sundarbans and hence the Sundarbans Ramsar Site.

“The construction of a coal-based power-plant will threaten the Royal Bengal Tiger and all of the bio-diversity of the Sundarbans. Since Bangladesh is a signatory of the Ramsar Conservation, we are bound, even more so internationally, in preserving the bio-diversity of the Sundarbans.

“The chief conservationist expresses the opinion that if a coal-based power-plant is constructed near the Sundarbans area of Khulna, it will harm the bio-diversity of the Sundarbans.

“The Ministry is thus requested to reconsider the construction a coal-based power plant on account of the importance of preserving the bio-diversity of the Sundarbans Ramsar Site (World Heritage Site).”

It is not possible for a government department to object more strongly than this to the proposed power plant at Rampal. One is curious to know if the chief conservationist has gotten anywhere in his efforts in obstructing the imperial interests of India.

Opinion of the Directorate of Environment

The Directorate of Environment, in a letter dated July 21, 2011, while acknowledging that the Rampal coal power-plant falls under the Ministry of Electricity and Fuel, nevertheless expressed an opinion since the matter is connected to the environment.

“Department of Environment is concerned about the possible adverse impact on the bio-diversity of Sundarbans, particularly on rich bio-diversities of Sundarbans Ramsar Site due to implementation of said project.

“Department of Environment has given positional clearance certificate for this project with various conditions related to environment.

“After going through the EIA report, if DoE finds that there will be adverse impacts on the bio-diversities of Sundarbans Ramsar Site as well as other areas and the mitigation measures proposed to overcome the impacts are not adequate enough, then DoE will cancel the positional certificate and will not issue environmental clearance certificate in favour of this project.”

“It should be noted here that a long time has passed since this letter was issued by the Environment Directorate, and in the meantime, an EIA has been published, which has been rejected by experts in a public hearing, and the government, in violation of the conditions of the positional clearance certificate, has filled up the wetlands even before the said EIA was issued.

But the Directorate of Environment, contrary to its promise, has not cancelled the positional certificate, and hasn’t issued any official statement regarding the EIA.

However, the Environment Directorate hasn’t yet issued a clearance certificate.

Objections of the Shipping Ministry

The Shipping Ministry has voiced several objections citing problems arising from construction work, as well as problems coming from increased ship movement.

Thus, we can see that it is not just the general people and members of the National Committee to Protect Oil Gas Mineral Resources Port and Power, but also that various departments of the government have raised serious objections to the proposed coal power-plant at Rampal.

 

This article was first published on AlalODulal.org and has been reprinted with permission. This is a translation of a Facebook post published by Kallol Mustafa on the June 23, 2013.