10% forced labour duty: RMG industry weighs future

In a major development for Bangladesh’s export trade, the United States has enacted a new 10% supplementary tariff on Bangladeshi imports starting Friday (July 24). 

Invoked under Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974 by the Donald Trump administration, the measure penalizes 60 trading partner nations for alleged insufficient action regarding forced labour in upstream supply chains.

While the added cost introduces fresh price pressures for exporters in Bangladesh’s largest single export destination, analysts and industry insiders note a strategic lining: key regional competitors face equal or higher trade barriers, leaving room for proactive supply-chain compliance to capture market share.

A 10% additional tariff became effective on July 24, 2026, covering exports to the US, including readymade garments (RMG), leather goods, home textiles, plastics, and agricultural products.

Imposed under Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974 targeting foreign trading partners for alleged supply chain links to forced labour.

Bangladesh (10%) holds a 2.5 percentage point duty advantage over chief apparel competitor Vietnam (12.5%), though it faces heightened competition from India, Cambodia, and Mexico (10%).

Industry leaders clarify that domestic factories maintain strict international compliance, asserting that penalizing exporters for unverified raw material origins in third countries is unjustified.

US policymakers are considering preferential tariff frameworks for countries sourcing American cotton—a potential structural advantage for Bangladesh that excludes India and Vietnam.

The Section 301 action categorizes partner nations into distinct tariff tiers, shifting the relative price dynamics in the US retail market.

 

Supplier Nation

Additional U.S. Tariff Rate

Competitive Position vs. Bangladesh

Bangladesh

10.0%

Baseline Target

India

10.0%

Parity

Cambodia / Indonesia

10.0%

Parity

Vietnam

12.5%

2.5% Cost Advantage for Bangladesh

China

12.5%

2.5% Cost Advantage for Bangladesh

"This is an additional duty imposed by the Trump administration that places broader international trade under strain," stated Mohammad Hatem, president of the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA). 

"Bangladesh maintains no forced labour practices in its domestic factories. Expecting our exporters to audit raw material origin conditions in third countries is unfeasible. This tariff adds pressure just as our garment sector was recovering, threatening order volumes and profit margins."

"In practice, a 10% tariff has effectively been priced into trade expectations over recent months; this formalization shifts it into a permanent legal frame," noted Mohiuddin Rubel, founder and CEO of Bangladesh Apparel Voice and former BGMEA director. 

"Because Vietnam faces a higher 12.5% rate, Bangladesh holds a relative competitive edge. Furthermore, potential US tariff exemptions tied to American cotton imports could favor Bangladesh over peers like India or Vietnam. Success now hinges on marketing agility, supply chain transparency, and product diversification rather than relying solely on low-cost production."

Non-apparel sector vulnerabilities

While garments represent nearly 80% of total export receipts, secondary export categories with narrower profit margins face elevated risks from buyer price-pushbacks.

Adapting to the new trade framework requires moving beyond price-based competition toward verifiable compliance and market diversification:

  • Active engagement between Bangladesh's commerce ministry, US trade representatives, and international brands to present audited proof of zero forced labour in domestic manufacturing.
  • Implementing digital supply-chain tracking tools to verify raw material sources from farmgate to finished garment.
  • Capitalizing on proposed US cotton import incentives to secure duty-offset advantages over non-eligible competitors.
  • Accelerating export penetration into non-traditional markets across the EU, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and the Middle East to reduce single-market reliance.

The US tariff policy signals a fundamental shift in global trade rules, where access depends as much on supply chain transparency, labour rights, and sustainability as it does on unit price. 

By enforcing strict traceability, leveraging raw material agreements, and optimizing market strategy, Bangladesh can convert current trade friction into a long-term competitive advantage.